I Debated With AI About Fighter Jets. Here’s Why I Think I’m Right.
I debated with Abby Ingelwood, my AI research assistant, about where and when PM Mark Carney will announce Canada’s Gripen fighter jet deal. Yes, that’s how I spend my mornings now. Cigar in one hand, laptop in the other, litigating geopolitics with a chatbot. Retirement is weird, but fun!!!
Here’s the setup for anyone who hasn’t been tracking the fighter jet saga: Canada’s been sitting on a decision about whether to expand its planned F-35 order or bring in Saab’s Gripen E as part of a mixed fleet. The reporting all points to a “high-low mix,” dozens of F-35s alongside dozens of Canadian-built Gripens, plus a related GlobalEye surveillance deal Canada already handed to Saab back in May. The jets themselves? Still unannounced.
Now look at the pattern. When Canada picked the German-made TKMS submarines back in July, the decision itself dropped quietly at CFB Halifax. Then, less than 24 hours later, Carney was standing shoulder to shoulder with the German and Norwegian leaders at the NATO summit in Ankara, taking the victory lap on European soil. Announce at home. Celebrate in Europe. That’s the playbook.
So when I saw Carney’s confirmed to attend Ursula von der Leyen’s State of the Union speech in Strasbourg on September 16, with a Canada-EU summit tacked on right after, my gut said: that’s it. That’s the room. Book the announcement.
Abby disagreed with me. Politely, but firmly. The argument: multiple reports say the Gripen announcement is being deliberately delayed until after the U.S. midterms in November, specifically so Ottawa doesn’t rattle Washington while Canada and the U.S. are mid-negotiation on trade. Strasbourg, by that logic, is two months too early.
Normally I’d say “fair enough”. Except something changed this week that Abby’s own argument doesn’t fully account for: trade talks with the U.S. collapsed, Trump slapped 50% tariffs on a chunk of Canadian goods, and Carney responded by saying Canada is matching those tariffs dollar for dollar, calling it exactly what it is: a trade war. That’s not “let’s not rattle Washington” energy. That’s “let’s rattle some chiclets; might as well announce the jets.”
The caution logic that had Carney waiting until after the midterms assumed there was still a relationship worth protecting. I’m not sure that assumption survives this week.
So here’s my prediction, for the record, dated and everything: Carney announces the Gripen deal, or at minimum confirms Canadian production, in Strasbourg on September 16. Not because the diplomatic calendar says so. Because the fight with Trump has made the “wait quietly” strategy look much less useful than it did a month ago.
Abby thinks I’m early. I think Abby’s modeling a version of Carney that no longer exists. We’ll find out in three weeks who’s right.
What’s your bet? Strasbourg? November? Later still? Drop it in the comments — I want receipts when one of us is wrong.





Your thought that Carney's announcement will take place in Strasbourg carries weight. What changed was the thread of hope that the US would negotiate rationally. If trade talks devolved into a submission play by the American's, Carney now has merit identifying the unpredictable and irrational behavior of the US has a significant factor. Announcing this in the company of European leaders is precisely the way to power shift the dynamic from being anti American, to pro European. Watch for other signals to develop that week as well, with the commencement of Canadian trade action, and domestic policy reinforcement.
'See you in September' 🎵
I bet my lunch money he waits.